
Logistik- und Mobilitätsplattformen zahlen eine wachsende Abgabe: Routing-Rechnungen pro Aufruf, die mit jedem neuen Fahrzeug steigen, statische Routen, die im Flottenmaßstab versagen, Telematik, die Punkte statt Entscheidungen zeigt, und geschlossene Engines, die sich nicht an Ihre Vorgaben anpassen lassen.
The answer is a spatial stack you own. Our engineers build self-hosted routing engines at 78–95% lower cost per call, real-time fleet dashboards, AI dispatch with mid-route re-optimisation, and delivery zone analytics, connecting telematics to operational decisions, with no per-call dependency.

Six operational failures we see across this industry. If three of them are yours, we should talk.
Every new vehicle, order, and matrix call raises the bill. Growth is taxed per request.
Fixed plans ignore live traffic, vehicle constraints, and time windows. Failed-delivery rates climb with volume.
Vendor algorithms cannot be tuned to your vehicle profiles, depots, and service times.
Estimates that never update against live conditions train customers to ignore them.
Bad geocoding turns into repeat visits, and repeat visits into per-drop cost.
Generic developers need months on routing graphs and projections before shipping anything.
One partner across the spatial stack. Self-hosted routing engines, real-time fleet intelligence, AI dispatch and delivery analytics, engineered to replace the per-call dependency, not extend it.

Software & Plattformen
The routing tax removed from your growth. pgRouting, OSRM, or Valhalla embedded in your driver and rider apps, benchmarked against your current provider before you migrate, so every new vehicle and order stops adding to a per-call API bill, and the engine becomes yours to own and tune.
Input: Routing invoices
Output: A stack you own
Telematics turned from dots on a map into decisions. GPS, OBD-II, CAN bus, and sensor feeds into PostGIS, surfacing planned vs actual route, dwell time, detour detection, and driver scoring, so dispatchers see what is actually happening, not just where vehicles are.
Input: Telematics feeds
Output: Spatial intelligence
Routes that adapt as the day changes, not plans that break by mid-morning. Dynamic dispatch with live ETA recalculation, time windows, vehicle profiles, and depots, plus territory planning by delivery density, so SLAs hold and failed deliveries fall as conditions shift.
Input: Static routes
Output: Live re-optimisation
Territories drawn from data instead of postcodes. Cost-per-drop heatmaps, failed-attempt hotspots, and micro-fulfilment catchment analysis, so you see exactly where delivery costs and failures concentrate, and redraw zones around reality.
Input: Delivery history
Output: Zones drawn from data
Temperature excursions caught as alerts, not discovered in disputes. Continuous temperature and humidity tracking with geo-fenced compliance zones and automated alerts, so a breach triggers action in real time instead of a spoilage claim after the fact.
Input: Sensor streams
Output: Alerts, not disputes
Two data-layer problems fixed at once: electrification planning and address quality. Range-aware routing, charging coverage, and depot scheduling, plus batch geocoding and standardisation, self-hosted with no per-call fees, so bad addresses stop driving failed deliveries and the EV transition runs on real coverage data.
Input: Addresses / fleet data
Output: Clean data layer
A GIS-native engineering team embedded in your codebase: routing, dispatch, and telematics features shipped on your sprint cadence, operational in 2 weeks under your brief.
Input: Your brief
Output: Embedded dev team
Every line of code, every repository, every schema is yours on handover. No retained IP. We are the engineering team: we build, ship, and hand over. We do not consult and walk away.
Book a Technical Session →Need geospatial data processing: address data QA, zone digitising, network records? See our Data Production services.
Outcomes
Benchmarked on your real volumes before migration.
Live recalculation as traffic and conditions change.
Engines, code, and data: no per-call dependency.
Failed-attempt hotspots and cost-per-drop by zone.
Territories follow delivery density, not postcodes.
Excursions raise alerts, not disputes.
Technology stack
Open engines, open standards, open data: production-grade and free of per-call dependency. This is the working stack we standardise on for logistics & mobility engagements; we integrate with the TMS, WMS, and order systems already in place rather than forcing replacement.
Replace per-call routing bills with engines you own, tuned to your vehicle profiles and constraints.
Telematics, orders and historical traces stored together, query-tuned for live dispatch and analytics.
GPS, OBD-II, CAN bus and cold-chain sensors into a spatial analytics layer in near real time.
Time windows, depots, vehicle profiles and live ETAs, re-optimised mid-route as conditions change.
Open engines, open standards, open data. Source code, infrastructure and tuning parameters transfer on handover, with no per-call dependency remaining.
GeoAI & ML for Logistics & Mobility. Road and network features extracted and kept current from imagery, so the routing graph does not go stale. Telematics history turned into predicted transit times instead of dots on a map. Every output measured against a benchmark and owned by a BSc+ engineer.
See the full GeoAI & ML stack
A 20-minute technical session: your routing cost benchmarked against a self-hosted equivalent. Numbers, not slides.
Architecture patterns for ingesting LoRaWAN, NB-IoT, and MQTT sensor data into PostGIS, and rendering it on interactive maps in sub-200ms.
A breakdown of pgRouting and OSRM vs per-call routing APIs, with real numbers from production fleet deployments.