Vendor-neutral platform evaluation, architecture design and migration planning, technical due diligence and team training, across open-source and proprietary GIS stacks.
Choosing a GIS stack, or inheriting the wrong one, is a decision most teams make once and live with for years, and the spatial layer is exactly where generalist IT teams slow down or get it wrong - whether that shows up as vendor lock-in, an unscoped migration, or a platform your own engineers were never trained on.
Vendor-neutral assessment of the right GIS stack for your project: open-source, proprietary, or a hybrid of the two.
Migration roadmaps off proprietary GIS licensing, and technical due diligence before you commit to a stack or a vendor.
Bringing your own engineers up to speed on the platform and stack once a migration or build is under way.
| Engagement | Strategic Advisory: platform evaluation, architecture design, migration roadmaps |
|---|---|
| Scope | Vendor-neutral across PostGIS, QGIS, GeoServer, MapLibre, OpenLayers, Cesium, FME and Esri |
Review of your current stack, the evaluation or migration question, and where the risk actually sits.
SoW, milestones and the evaluation, architecture or migration scope, under an English-law contract.
Platform evaluation, architecture design or migration plan delivered, plus technical due diligence or team training as scoped.
Extend the recommendations as your platform or team changes. You keep the roadmap.
On-premise to cloud, desktop to web: legacy GIS modernised with geodatabase consolidation and performance optimisation, preserving how your team already works.
Autonomous spatial workflows built on the data infrastructure we already deliver: natural-language spatial queries, monitoring agents, and a governed audit layer.